Integrity (part one)
Sunday, December 19th, 2010I do a lot of things at NeighborScapes. I’m a mentor for a few young adults who I’ve bonded to particularly over the course of some of our organized programmatic activity. I’m a liason for the nonprofit to community stakeholders and partners, and frequently the first point of contact for donors and volunteers (or have a propensity for recruiting random people I encounter to donate or volunteer…) I’ve done limited program design, and some extremely reluctant audit work. But, lately, I’m a grant writer, bolstering the capacity of other nonprofits in the Southland and cavorting about as a gun-for-hire. I get a kick out of finding out how to run a nonprofit at optimum performance, and helping grow nonprofits to that point.
And, over the course of my grant writing experience, I have indeed learned a lot about what makes nonprofits function. A staggering proportion of them cater to the grant, fulfilling the expectations of whoever promises to keep their doors open and their salaries paid. All of the grant writing training I’ve had, has told me to write the grant by promising to fulfill each of its terms, and do it cost effectively.
The problem with this, is that it creates a culture of thousands of cookie cutter programs vying for limited (and shrinking) federal funding contracts; the effect is replicated in the hundreds across State contracts and in the tens across County ones. The bigger private foundations see the same effect, in proportion to the degree of detail their proposals ask for. Requests for Quotes (RFQs) tend to be pretty specific in the activity they want the recipients of their awards to perform, and if an applicant fails to make those promises, that applicant is Seldom Offered Licensure (S.O.L.).
This frightening reality often makes the more hefty, established nonprofits that really could drive meaningful, sector-wide change, paralyzed and less able to enact this change. Instead, they strive to always do what they have always done, but better and cheaper and for more people. This is good, if what they are doing is sensitive to the needs of the surrounding community and the modern era. But it is very, very bad, if, say, Washington DC or Springfield, IL do not know the needs of Dolton, IL, and don’t know what questions to ask. Or, if a nonprofit in Tinley, IL designs a financial literacy program in 2001, the cornerstone of which is “buying a home is always a good financial investment”- and relies on the grant to pay its people, and fears changing the curriculum for ear of losing the grant, to the point that it runs essentially the same program by 2010.
The NeighborScapes philosophy is to always do one better than the grant asks for. This is smart, from a competitive angle- an application that promises 110%, and a nonprofit that has been coached to perform what it has promised, will almost always have a strategic advantage over those who only promise to do what’s asked of them, all else taken equally. It’s smart, because it gives back to the funder- not only in supplying the funder with feet on the ground to carry out the funder’s mission, but with a deeper understanding of the social goal the nonprofit and the funder share. And it’s smart, because it preserves the diversity, individuality, and nuance of the individual nonprofit applying for the grant. If, after all the boxes are filled, there’s still room in the margins- a nonprofit is free to add whatever to the margins it pleases, so long as it believes this extra will also please the funder. And, you know, that the RFQ has not specifically forbidden such margin doodling.
It’s why I’m sitting in a borrowed office today, far past when the regular tenants of the miles of cubicles surround me have gone home, busting All Services Securable to bring in yet another massive federal grant with draconian expectations. I’m an hourly employee, my job doesn’t offer benefits, and I’m making far below my worth in a for-profit company. But I love my job.
I think it’s because NeighborScapes takes the same philosophy for its youth- and its staff. Yes, I’ll design a GED program for Yasmine- but if Yasmine wants to be a CSI, I’ll design a GED program catered to getting her into crime-solving. Karen wants a job with benefits and health insurance, to support her family- but also loves numbers? Okay, let’s put her on a career track, not just somewhere that will take care of her basic needs. Let’s preserve the artistic leanings of the youth who come to us looking for menial jobs that will pay regularly, let’s make businessmen out of hustlers, let’s make scholars out of students and advocates out of earnest individuals.
People- and organizations, especially nonprofits- are complex and nuanced and beautiful. And I’m so glad to be able to help keep them running- and keep them remembering what it’s like to be themselves.
Chris Furuya is the program coordinator for NeighborScapes, a volunteering, community organizing, and civic leadership nonprofit located in the South suburbs of Chicago. Her twitter handle is earthangelNS.

